40 enterprises in Jiangsu Province were punished for exceeding the standard discharge and private condominium

Jiangsu Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment

Typical environmental violations in Jiangsu Province in 2018 (second batch)

Since 2018, the province's environmental protection system has conscientiously implemented the national and provincial ecological environmental protection conferences and the spirit of the province's ecological environment law enforcement work conference, adhered to the principle of “regular regulation according to law, effective and effective service”, focusing on improving environmental quality and solving outstanding Environmental issues have severely investigated and handled a number of typical illegal cases that have been strongly reflected by the masses and concerned by the superiors. The level of environmental law enforcement supervision in the province has been further improved. A number of major environmental violations have been announced and social supervision has been accepted.

I. Jiangsu Renxin Crop Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

On May 29th, the Nanjing Environmental Protection Bureau organized the monitoring of the exhaust gas outlet of Jiangsu Renxin Crop Protection Technology Co., Ltd. The monitoring results show that the monitoring value of the exhaust gas (FQ-1) discharge port of the synthetic workshop is between 345 and 1420 mg/m3, which exceeds the secondary standard of Table 2 of the Comprehensive Emission Standard for Air Pollutants GB16297-1996. On June 12, the Nanjing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act and ordered Renxin to immediately stop the illegal discharge. On August 10, the Nanjing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, which imposed a fine of 399,000 yuan on the environmental violations of the company's excessive emissions.

Second, Nanjing Jiangqiao Building Materials Industry Co., Ltd.

On May 1st, Nanjing City and Qixia District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Nanjing Jiangqiao Building Materials Industry Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the pH value of the wastewater and rain drains in the rainwater collection tank of the company was 12.16; there was a concealed pipe on the north side of the plant. The pit pond with no anti-seepage measures in the southeast corner of the factory, the pH value of the water under the concealed pipe is 12.11. On May 4, the Qixia District Environmental Protection Bureau issued a decision to seal up the relevant facilities. On October 8, the Nanjing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, which imposed a fine of 620,000 yuan on the environmental violations of the company's rain discharges and the discharge of water pollutants.

Third, Nanjing Shuguang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.

On September 4, the Nanjing Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Nanjing Shuguang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., and found that the lye in the liquefied alkali tank of the 520 workshop waste gas caustic washing tower was seriously insufficient, and the exhaust gas treatment facilities were not operating normally. On October 31, the Nanjing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately correct environmental violations and impose a fine of 325,000 yuan.

Fourth, Wuxi Sankai High Purification Co., Ltd.

On May 21, Wuxi Environmental Protection Bureau conducted a petition investigation on Wuxi Sankai High Purification Co., Ltd., and found that the company illegally diluted the high-concentration wastewater generated by the second-phase project and discharged it into the sampling tube of the sewage treatment station online detector. Tap water deliberately interferes with online instrument detection data and is suspected of evading illegal discharge of pollutants. On May 22, the Wuxi Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act. On October 8, the Wuxi Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and imposed a fine of 850,000 yuan. At the same time, the case was transferred to the public security organ.

V. Wuxi Shengli Paper Co., Ltd.

On June 26, Wuxi Xishan District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Wuxi Shengli Paper Co., Ltd. and found that the company incorporated tap water before the sampling point of the facility discharge to dilute the pollutant concentration, suspected of evading regulatory illegal emissions. Contaminants. On August 8, the Xishan District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered to immediately correct the above-mentioned environmental violations, imposed a fine of 900,000 yuan, and transferred the case to the public security organs.

VI. Huishan District Yanqiao Diqiang Hardware Products Processing Factory Pollution Environment Case

On July 1st, Wuxi Huishan District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Huishan District Weiqiao Diqiang Hardware Products Processing Factory and found that the factory produced aluminum radiator without authorization, and did not support pollution prevention and control facilities; monitoring results It shows that the rainwater drain in the east of the workshop is COD854mg/L. On August 6, the Huishan District Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act. On September 11, the administrative punishment decision was issued, and a fine of 369,500 yuan was imposed, and the case was transferred to the public security organ.

7. Jiangsu Yuhui Fiber Technology Co., Ltd.

On October 10th and October 29th, Pei County Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Yuhui Fiber Technology Co., Ltd. and found that the company was engaged in cotton yarn production without authorization. On December 18th, Pei County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the company to immediately improve environmental protection procedures, and imposed a fine of 500,000 yuan.

8. Xuzhou Zhongfa Water Investment Co., Ltd.

On October 16, Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Xuzhou Zhongfa Water Investment Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the total discharge COD was 96.3 mg/L (0.93 times exceeding the standard). On October 19, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act and ordered it to stop the illegal act immediately. On October 22, the inspector of the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau found that the company was still exceeding the standard for sewage discharge, and the total discharge COD was 120 mg/L (exceeding 1.40 times). On October 23, the company had reached the standard discharge after the inspector of the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau, and the total discharge COD was 48.8 mg/L. On December 18, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and fined 100,000 yuan for its wastewater discharge exceeding the standard. On December 26, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau issued a penalty decision, which imposed continuous fines on the illegal discharge of wastewater from October 20-22, and imposed a fine of 300,000 yuan.

9. Jiangsu Jinmeishang Automobile Industry Co., Ltd.

On June 9, Xuzhou City Jiawang District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Jiangsu Jinmeishang Automobile Co., Ltd. and found that the company was completed and put into production without environmental approval. On July 5, the Jiawang District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately correct the above-mentioned environmental violations and impose a fine of 450,000 yuan.

X. Jiangsu Shente Steel Co., Ltd.

On April 23, Fuyang Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Shente Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. and found that no dust-proof net was built on the north and east sides of the open-pit yard of mineral powder, coal and other raw materials on the south side of the company's plant; Dedusting slag, tailings slag, water slag and other open storage yards are not equipped with dust-proof nets and water sprinkler facilities. On May 29, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Puyang City issued an order to correct the violation of the law and ordered it to immediately correct the above-mentioned environmental violations. On June 14, the Fuyang Environmental Protection Bureau conducted a review and found that the company did not implement the dust control measures on the yard as required. On June 20, Fuyang City Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and imposed a fine of 50,000 yuan on the company's environmental violations on April 23. On August 15, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Fuyang City issued an administrative penalty decision, and imposed continuous punishment on the illegal acts from May 30 to June 14 for a total fine of 800,000 yuan.

XI. Changzhou Edelweiss Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd.

On April 19th, Changzhou Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Changzhou Xueronghua Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd. and found that the production line of the setting machine in the finishing workshop of the company was being produced, but the pollution prevention facilities of the supporting construction were not running. On April 27th, Changzhou Environmental Protection Bureau issued a decision to seal up the production equipment such as setting machines. On August 27th, Changzhou Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, fined 350,000 yuan for the company's abnormal operation of pollution prevention facilities, and transferred the case to the public security organs.

12. Changzhou Runxin Cement Co., Ltd. Pollution Environment Case

On May 10th, Changzhou Wujin District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Changzhou Runxin Cement Co., Ltd., and found that the company collected the washing waste water from the clinker grinding cement processing project and the overflow of vehicle washing wastewater into the Taimu Canal. The monitoring results showed that the pH of the wastewater was 11.42, which was alkaline. On May 13, Wujin District Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal behavior, ordered it to immediately correct the illegal activities of illegal sewage, and at the same time, the vehicle washing equipment electrical cabinet was sealed up. On June 10, Wujin District Environmental Protection Bureau found on the spot that the company had not been rectified in place, so the time limit for the seizure was extended according to law. On July 5, the Wujin District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, fined 400,000 yuan for the above-mentioned environmental violations, and transferred the case to the public security organ.

XIII. Taicang Huaye Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd.

On June 27th, Suzhou Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Taicang Huaye Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. After investigation, on June 26, the company did not follow the specifications when conducting environmental protection tests on diesel vehicles with license plate numbers SU EET966 and Su HN5735. The sampling probe is inserted into the exhaust pipe of the vehicle to be inspected, and a test report is issued and a test fee is charged. On October 9, the Suzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and fined 400,000 yuan for its environmental violations.

14. Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Gaoxin Division Company Pollution Environment Case

On June 28th, Suzhou Huqiu District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Gaoxin Branch Company and found that the company's supporting pollution prevention facilities were not put into production without experience. The monitoring results showed that the north side rainwater drainage port Wastewater pH9.29, COD2110mg/L, sewage total discharge wastewater pH10.10. On August 2nd, Huqiu District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the company to correct environmental violations such as excessive discharge, with a total fine of 1.55 million yuan. And the relevant responsible person Zhu was fined 50,000 yuan.

Fifteen, and Xia Chemical (Taicang) Co., Ltd. privately set up a dark tube case

On May 24, the Taicang Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Xia Chemical (Taicang) Co., Ltd. and found that the company diluted the high-concentration production wastewater and discharged it to avoid the discharge of water pollutants in a regulatory manner. In the later investigation, Taicang City Environmental Protection The bureau found that the company had privately installed dark pipes from September 2017 to May 2018 to directly discharge high-concentration production wastewater to the Suitang River, causing serious pollution. On August 13, the Taicang City Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the company to immediately correct the illegal act, imposed a fine of 800,000 yuan, and transferred the case to the public security organ.

XVI. Jiangsu Hailun Dyeing & Finishing Co., Ltd.

On May 20th, Nantong Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Hailun Dyeing & Finishing Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the total discharge of wastewater was COD324mg/L (0.62 times exceeding the standard). On June 1, the Nantong Environmental Protection Bureau issued an order to correct the illegal act and ordered the company to immediately correct the illegal act. On August 17, Nantong Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the company to limit production for 30 days, and imposed a fine of 600,000 yuan.

17. Nantong Yanfa Textile Co., Ltd.

On May 9, Nantong Tongzhou District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Nantong Yanfa Textile Co., Ltd. and found that the company did not construct a wastewater pollution prevention and control facility. The printing wastewater directly passed through the rainwater pipeline and was discharged from Xingren Henghe. On May 11, the inspector of the Tongzhou District Environmental Protection Bureau found that the Yanfa textile printing wastewater was still directly discharged without treatment, and the Tongzhou District Environmental Protection Bureau accordingly sealed the company's printing workshop according to law. On September 17, the Tongzhou District Environmental Protection Bureau imposed a fine of 300,000 yuan on the company's environmental violations and transferred the case to the public security organ.

18. Jiangsu Province Special Sports Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

On June 29, Nantong Gangzha District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Youteji Sports Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and found that the company was engaged in sports equipment production without environmental protection approval. The monitoring results showed that the rainwater well COD782mg/ in the southeast side of the plant area L, ammonia nitrogen 19.92 mg / L. On August 20, the Gangzha District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and imposed a fine of 810,000 yuan and a fine of 80,000 yuan for the legal representative.

19. Lianyungang Ruipeng Chemical Co., Ltd. exceeded the standard discharge case

On June 5, the environmental protection bureau of Lianyungang Economic and Technological Development Zone conducted on-site inspection of Lianyungang Ruipeng Chemical Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the total wastewater of the company's wastewater was 1830mg/L (over 227.75 times) and ammonia nitrogen 53.1mg/L ( Exceeding 0.18 times) and COD 545mg/L (0.09 times exceeding the standard). On June 9, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Lianyungang Economic and Technological Development Zone issued an order to correct the illegal behavior, ordered the company to suspend production and rectify, and correct the illegal behavior of exceeding the standard. On August 13, Lianyungang Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, and fined 800,000 yuan for environmental violations that exceeded the discharge of wastewater.

20. Jiangsu Jinzhengyang Mining Co., Ltd.

On May 31, Lianyungang Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Jiangsu Jinzhengyang Mining Co., Ltd., and found that the company's material yard was piled up in the open air, the site was not hardened, and effective dust prevention measures were not taken. The monitoring results showed that the total suspended particulate matter 6.141 Mg/m3 (exceeded 5.14 times). On July 13, the Environmental Protection Bureau of the Bengbu District issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately stop the illegal act and impose a fine of 880,000 yuan.

Twenty-one, Jiangsu Donghai Laohuai Pig Industry Development Co., Ltd.

On July 31, Donghai County Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Donghai Laohuai Pig Industry Development Co., Ltd., and found that the company did not construct supporting sewage treatment facilities, and the wastewater generated was directly discharged. On August 8, the Donghai County Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the environmental violations and ordered the company to stop the illegal activities. On August 15, Donghai County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan on environmental violations such as pollution prevention and control facilities, untreated sewage, and other environmental violations, and fined 50,000 of the responsible person Meng. yuan.

22. Haiyun New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

On April 11th, Huai'an Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Haiyun New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., and found that the company was engaged in the destruction of construction waste materials without the approval of environmental protection, and did not support the construction of pollution prevention facilities, resulting in dust, noise and no Organized dust pollution is serious. On June 26, Huai'an Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering it to immediately stop the construction of waste materials and impose a fine of 300,000 yuan.

Twenty-three, Huai'an Zhongke Environmental Protection Power Co., Ltd. exceeded the standard discharge case

From July 19th to August 16th, Huai'an Industrial Park Management Committee organized the monitoring of the waste gas discharge port of Huai'an Zhongke Environmental Protection Electric Power Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the exhaust gas of 3# incinerator was 5805.8mg/m3 (over 57.06 times exceeded). ), NOX518.1mg/m3 (over 0.73 times); 2#CO2048mg/m3 (over 19.48 times); 1#NOX390.6mg/m3 (over 0.30 times). On October 20, the Huai'an Environmental Protection Bureau issued an order to restrict production decisions and ordered a total incineration to be reduced by 30%. On November 9, the Huai'an Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, which imposed a fine of 300,000 yuan on environmental violations that exceeded the emission standards.

Twenty-four, Yu Shengyuan Environmental Protection Technology Development Co., Ltd.

On May 11, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Jixian County conducted on-site inspection of Qishengyuan Environmental Protection Technology Development Co., Ltd. and found that the company discharged the production wastewater to the pits without anti-seepage measures in the plant area. The monitoring results showed that the pH of the wastewater was 11.92, which was alkaline. On July 1, the Jixian Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the enterprise to correct environmental violations, and imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan, and transferred the case to the public security organ.

25. The case of a metal surface treatment processing point polluting environment in Jianhu County

On June 7, the Jianhu County Environmental Protection Bureau on-site inspection of the surface treatment and heat treatment processing of an illegal metal product found that the surface treatment and heat treatment processing points of the metal product were not approved by the environmental protection, and were put into operation without authorization. The production wastewater is discharged without treatment. On June 7, the Jianhu County Environmental Protection Bureau sealed up the production facilities such as the processing furnace. On July 5, the Jianhu County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the processing site to stop production, and fined 300,000 yuan for its environmental violations.

Twenty-six, Suining Jinsong Textile Co., Ltd.

On May 18, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Suining Jinsong Textile Co., Ltd. and found that the company's shading cloth and home textile project did not have a wastewater pretreatment facility. The main project of the project was put into production, and the waste gas treatment facilities were not in operation. On May 18, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act, ordered the company to immediately stop production and correct environmental violations. On July 3, the Suining County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and fined 400,000 yuan for its environmental violations.

27. Yancheng Hengyu Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd.

On July 2, Yancheng City Yandu District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Yancheng Hengyu Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. and found that the company was engaged in the manufacture of wooden doors without environmental protection approval, and did not support the construction of effective pollution prevention facilities. On July 20, the Yandu District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately correct environmental violations and impose a fine of 320,000 yuan.

Twenty-eight, Sinopec Pipeline Storage and Transportation Co., Ltd. Nanjing Oil Transportation Department Yizheng Gas Station Pollution Environment Case

On March 13, Yizheng Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Sinopec Pipeline Storage and Transportation Co., Ltd., and found that the company's supporting pollution prevention facilities were not subject to environmental protection acceptance, and the crude oil pipeline double-track project was put into production without authorization. On August 29, Yizheng Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered the company to complete the rectification within a time limit, fined 300,000 yuan for the environmental violations that were not tested first, and fined 60,000 yuan for the relevant person.

Twenty-nine, Yangzhou Weiyang Bean Food Co., Ltd.

On June 13, Yangzhou Guangling District Environmental Protection Bureau on-site inspection of Yangzhou Weiyang Bean Food Co., Ltd. found that some of the company's production wastewater was discharged through the rain discharge port. The monitoring results showed that the total discharge water sample COD3796mg/L, suspended solids 2200mg / L, rain drainage water sample COD788mg / L, suspended matter 258mg / L. On June 16, the Guangling District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an order to correct the illegal behavior and ordered to restrict production notification, ordered it to correct the illegal activities, and restricted the production of soybean products processing production line. On June 26, the Guangling District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and imposed a fine of 650,000 yuan.

30. Baoying County Huifeng Water Co., Ltd.

On June 6, Baoying County Environmental Protection Bureau on-site inspection of Baoying County Huifeng Water Co., Ltd. found that in the company's wastewater treatment facilities, the dosing box was free of chemicals, the disinfection facilities were not running, and the belt filter press was idle. On June 7, the Baoying County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an order to correct the illegal act and ordered it to immediately stop the illegal act. On August 20, the Baoying County Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision and imposed a fine of 700,000 yuan on the company.

Thirty-one, Taixing Hongqiao Zhongjian Sewage Treatment Co., Ltd.

On June 13, Taixing Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Taixing Hongqiao Zhongjian Sewage Treatment Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that the total discharge water COD was 80 mg/L (0.60 times higher than standard) and the total nitrogen was 40.1 mg/L (exceeded 1.67 times). ). On June 21, the Taizhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued a order to correct the illegal act and ordered it to immediately stop environmental violations. After the inspection on July 10, the monitoring results showed that the total discharge water COD was 80 mg/L (exceeding 0.60 times), suspended matter was 38 mg/L (exceeding 2.80 times), ammonia nitrogen was 7.6 mg/L (exceeding 0.52 times), and total phosphorus was 0.664 mg. /L (excessive 0.32 times), total nitrogen 22.2mg / L (exceeded 0.48 times). On July 16, the Taizhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau again issued a decision to correct the illegal act. On November 21st, Taizhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, and imposed continuous fines on the environmental violations of the company's excessive discharge of water pollutants, with a total fine of 3.8 million yuan.

Thirty-two, Jiangsu Shangshou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. pollution environment case

On April 11, Taizhou City Jiangyan District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Jiangsu Shangshou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and found that the company's coal-fired boiler was being used. The supporting water film dust collector spray water pump had been removed and the spraying facilities were not working properly. run. On July 6, the Taizhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordered to immediately correct the illegal acts, and imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan. On July 20, the Taizhou Environmental Protection Bureau transferred the case to the public security organ.

Thirty-three, Taizhou Towel Factory Co., Ltd. exceeded the standard discharge case

On June 15th, Taizhou Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Taizhou Towel Factory Co., Ltd. and found that the company's boiler was running. The monitoring results showed that the boiler exhaust gas Ringermann blackness was level 2, and the exhaust gas exceeded the standard. On June 21, Taizhou Environmental Protection Bureau issued a decision to seal up the company's boilers. On July 18, Taizhou Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering Taizhou Towel Factory Co., Ltd. to immediately stop exceeding the discharge of pollutants and impose a fine of 500,000 yuan.

Thirty-four, Jurong Yuming Chemical Co., Ltd. privately set up a dark tube case

On April 9th, Zhenjiang Environmental Protection Bureau and Jurong City Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Jurong Yuming Chemical Co., Ltd., and found that there was a dark pipe on the northeast side of the company's sewage pool, and the wastewater was discharged through the dark pipe. On July 10, Jurong City Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately correct environmental violations and impose a fine of 400,000 yuan. On August 1, Jurong City Environmental Protection Bureau transferred the case to the public security organ.

35. Zhenjiang Maoyuan Chemical Co., Ltd.

On June 22, Zhenjiang Dantu District Environmental Protection Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Zhenjiang Maoyuan Chemical Co., Ltd., and found that the company's industrial salicylic acid and other projects supporting pollution prevention facilities have not been accepted and put into production. On September 19th, the Dantu District Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering Maoyuan Chemical to immediately correct the above-mentioned environmental violations and impose a fine of 300,000 yuan.

Thirty-six, Danyang Longjiang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. tampering data case

On June 14, Danyang Environmental Protection Bureau on-site inspection of Danyang Longjiang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. found that the company's rolling steel heating furnace section did not build supporting exhaust gas treatment facilities, coke, raw material transfer warehouse did not build dust removal facilities, pellets, coke and other materials. Stacked in the open air. On June 25, Zhenjiang Environmental Protection Bureau and the Public Security Bureau found that the company repeatedly tampered with the online monitoring system coefficients and interfered with automatic monitoring data. On June 27, the Danyang Municipal Public Security Bureau investigated the crime of suspicion of destroying the computer information system, and five persons involved in the case were criminally detained according to law. On October 22, the Danyang Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, and imposed a fine of 1.2 million yuan on the illegal activities of the company.

37. Jiangsu Jucheng Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.

On August 10th, Suqian Environmental Protection Bureau conducted on-site inspection of Jiangsu Jucheng Diamond Technology Co., Ltd., and found that the company's Jingang line project was not put into production without experience, and the corundum electroplating project was not approved. On November 1, Suqian City Environmental Protection Bureau issued an administrative penalty decision, and fined 804,100 yuan for illegal activities such as untested first investment.

38. Suqian Huahong Electronic Industry Co., Ltd.

On July 5, Suqian Environmental Protection Bureau of Suqian City conducted on-site inspection of Suqian Huahong Electronic Industry Co., Ltd. The monitoring results showed that COD 822mg/L (exceeding 1.64 times) of waste water was taken over from the discharge port; COD 171mg/L of rain discharge water (excessive standard) 1.71 times). On August 22, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Suyu District issued an administrative penalty decision, ordering the company to immediately correct the environmental violations of excessive pollutant discharge and impose a fine of 300,000 yuan.

39. Suqian Changcai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd.

On June 14, Suqian Environmental Protection Bureau on-site inspection of Suqian Changcai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. found that the company's dyeing and molding project did not support the construction of pollution prevention facilities, and the production wastewater was untreated. On June 14, Suqian City Environmental Protection Bureau issued a seizure decision to seal up the company's high-temperature dyeing machine power distribution cabinet. On June 15, Suqian City Environmental Protection Bureau transferred the case to the public security organ. On July 3, the Suqian City Environmental Protection Bureau issued a penalty decision and imposed a fine of 300,000 yuan on environmental violations such as the company's unexperienced and unauthorized production.

Forty, Yangzhou Jieyuan Drainage Co., Ltd.

On April 27th, the former Provincial Environmental Protection Department commissioned the Nanjing Environmental Protection Bureau to carry out on-site inspection of Yangzhou Jieyuan Drainage Co., Ltd. Tangwang Wastewater Treatment Plant. The monitoring results showed that the total phosphorus concentration of the total discharge wastewater was 2.08mg/L ( Exceeded the standard 1.1 times). On May 16, the former Provincial Environmental Protection Department issued a order to correct the illegal act and ordered it to immediately correct the environmental violations exceeding the standard. On June 4, when the former Provincial Environmental Protection Department was inspected, the Tangwang Wastewater Treatment Plant had completed the upgrading of the standard, and the high-efficiency sedimentation tank (for further removal of total phosphorus) had been put into use. The total phosphorus concentration of the discharged wastewater was 0.25 mg/ L. On August 27, the former Provincial Environmental Protection Department issued a penalty decision and fined 600,000 yuan for the company's environmental violations exceeding the standard.

This article is posted on this website for the purpose of transmitting more information and does not imply endorsement of its views or confirmation of its description.

Article source address: http://

Aluminiu Venetian Blinds

The aluminum Venetian Blinds are fashion, beautiful, simple and elegant, which can create a peaceful and quiet atmosphere, thus making the entire space transparent and varied.

The material is health and environmental protection. The product has the features like colorful, good elasticity, corrosion resistance, high strength, durable, not easy to deform, heat insulation, breathable and fireproof, etc.

beautiful, simple,elegant,fashion,good elasticity, corrosion resistance, high strength

WUXI MIFUN INTERNATIONAL TRADE CO.,LTD , https://www.mifunblinds.com